Legal Opinion

United States Trust Co. v. Frelinghuysen

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Plaintiff and defendants move for summary judgment. The action is to recover certain unpaid interest on defendants’ bond, together with the amount of payments made by plaintiff by way of taxes, assessments and insurance premiums. The answer denies that the bond sued on was delivered for a valuable or adequate consideration and, by way of defense, alleges that by the execution of the bond the defendants became sureties only and not principal debtors and the plaintiff must ' resort to the estate of the original mortgagor.

Plaintiff is the holder of a bond for $50,000 and a mortgage for the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honeyman v. HananNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Bulkley v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Ardlea Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Fairchild v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Newcomb v. . HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Employees Credit Union v. HawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. James Employees Credit Union v. HawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API