Legal Opinion

Scully v. Schubert

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 19, 1990No. 89-291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This case presents the issue of whether the usual rule of appellate waiver of trial error applies when a state’s attorney’s office, after mishandling a URESA petition, moves for relief from judgment on an erroneous ground. We hold that due to the nature of URESA proceedings the rule that a lawyer’s tactical decisions bind a client is relaxed and accordingly reverse and remand.

Allison Scully was an unmarried inn-worker in the Dorset area of Vermont when she became pregnant in September 1985. She left the state and moved to Ipswich, Massachusetts, in November 1985, and there gave birth to Emma.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New England Educational Training Service, Inc. v. Silver Street PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Bushway v. RiendeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. Haskins v. Estate of HaskinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  4. In re J. H. & R. H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Child Support Enforcement Division of Alaska v. BrenckleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. McSweeney v. McSweeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands ex rel. Simanca v. ProctorSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API