Legal Opinion
Rhoden v. Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1998No. 98-5088PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellant’s response to this court’s order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the basis of a late notice of appeal. Counsel for the appellant responded stating that he sought and was granted extensions of time by the district court; that this court has jurisdiction pursuant to the “unique circumstances” doctrine of Thompson v. INS, 375 U.S. 384, 84 S.Ct. 397, 11 L.Ed.2d 404 (1964) (per curiam); and that this court followed Thompson in Birrell v. Brown, 867 F.2d 956 (6th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- William Hope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Douglas E. Baker v. Larry RaulieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Joseph E. Birrell v. Robert Brown, Director, Michigan Dept. Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Davignon v. ClemmeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- National Ecological Foundation v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Keith Bowles v. Harry Russell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Fhc Equities, L.L.C. v. Mbl Life Assurance Corporation, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Rhoden v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.