Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hume
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1937No. Civ. A. 90224PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, P. J.
The plaintiff and respondent sues in three counts as assignee of J. C. Austin, alleging that the defendants and appellants are husband and wife. The first count of the complaint alleges a balance due from defendants on an open book account for dental services incurred within the four years next prior to the filing of the complaint on May 17, 1937, in the sum of $30. The second count alleges an indebtedness by defendants in a like sum of $30 on an account alleged to have been stated on or about June 1, 1935, based on an account of more than one item, the date of the last item having been May…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gunn v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- The QueenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Estate of SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Elizabeth B. Johnson v. Charles B. MacCoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- San Diego White Truck Co. v. SwiftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Robertson v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.