Legal Opinion

Shippee v. Commercial Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The first question reserved in The Naugatuck Bank and Trust Company case is as follows: “Is The Naugatuck National Bank, as receiver of The Naugatuck Bank and Trust Company liable for the payment of a tax in accordance with Sections 1285 and 1287 of the General Statutes, computed on a basis of the amount of deposits on hand as of January 1, 1932?” The answer thereto is determinative of both cases, argued together in this court. The mate rial facts concerning the appointment of the respective receivers and their powers and acts thereunder will be stated hereafter in appropriate connection. It…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Society for Savings v. CoiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Provident Institution v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Commonwealth v. Lancaster Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Department of Public Welfare Ex Rel. Central State Hospital v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Robinson v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  4. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. Bridgeport Land & Title Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API