Legal Opinion

Fairbanks v. Dená Nená Henash

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2004No. S-9849, S-10029PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 P.3d 124 (2004)

FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

DENÁ NENÁ HENASH a/k/a Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. S-9849, S-10029.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 2, 2004.

A. René Broker, Assistant Borough Attorney, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Michael J. Walleri, Law Offices of Michael J. Walleri, Fairbanks, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. (TCC), also known as Dená Nená Henash, is a regional Native…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Animal Rescue League v. Assessors of BourneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. G.D.L. Plaza Corp. v. Council Rock School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State, Department of Revenue v. DeLeonAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In the Matter of the Protective Proceedings of Vernon H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough AssessorAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Henash v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API