Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1923No. A-3936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.

Karl Hoffman, plaintiff in error, here designated. the defendant, was, by information filed in the district court of Mayes county charged with the larceny of certain tools and articles of hardware taken from the hardware store of H. C. Henson at Locust Grove on March 24, 1920. At the trial, September 21, 1921, by a verdict of the jury, defendant was found guilty of grand larceny, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of eight months. Subsequently, the court pronounced judgment upon the verdict, directing that the defendant be confined in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Woods v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Filson v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. IrrizariNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. Pecos Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Howard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fugate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Carson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API