Legal Opinion

Haines v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1976No. 43676PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Appellant, Anaconda Aluminum Com pany, appeals a superior court judgment which declared Laws of 1971, 1st Ex. Sess., ch. 43 1 (hereinafter referred to as chapter 43), unconstitutional and denied appellant an ad valorem property tax deduction.

In 1967, appellant and the Port of Everett executed a lease which gave appellant the right to use the public dock facilities at the port. A port revenue bond issue provided the funds to build the Everett port facilities. The lease required the appellant to pay the port sufficient rent to enable it to repay the principal and interest on the bonds.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Taskett v. King Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Geise v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Metropolitan Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Bradbury v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lau v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API