Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCracken

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1995PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Terrence McCracken, appeals from the Order of the Superior Court which reversed the trial court’s grant of a new trial based on after-discovered evidence. Because we find that the trial court did not err in granting Appellant’s motion, we reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.

On October 25, 1983, following a trial by jury, Appellant was found guilty of murder of the second degree,1 two counts of robbery,2 and one count of criminal conspiracy.3 Appellant filed post-verdict motions seeking inter alia a new trial based on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. MedinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API