Legal Opinion
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 12, 2023No. 1:21-cv-01482Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, 1:21-cv-01482-JLT-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE SECOND 13 vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 WATROUS, et al., (ECF No. 23.) 15 Defendants AND 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE 17 DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 18 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE ON OR 19 BEFORE JUNE 27, 2023 20 21 22 23 24 25 I. BACKGROUND 26 Plaintiff, Sean J. Richson-Bey, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 27 in this…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.