Legal Opinion

Reidman Agency, Inc. v. Musnicki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to defendants, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff is an insurance agency. Defendant Musnicki is a salesman formerly employed by plaintiff, and defendant Allyn & Small, Inc., is the insurance agency by whom he is presently employed. During Musnicki’s employment with plaintiff, he had in his possession a “customer list” or production report containing the names of some of plaintiff’s customers expiration dates of their policies, the amounts and types of coverage purchased, and the premium charged. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Hudson Valley Propane Corp. v. ByrneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Foods Plus, Inc. v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Levine v. BochnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Cool Insuring Agency, Inc. v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. International Paper Co. v. SuwynDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Riedman Corp. v. GallagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Brewster-Allen-Wichert, Inc. v. KieplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API