Legal Opinion

Texas Midland Railroad v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 24, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before Hon. J. E. Dillard.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

In bar of this action to recover damages for personal injuries appellant exhibited a written release, which appellee sought to avoid on the ground that appellant had obtained it fraudulently and without consideration. The release was executed Februarjr 15, 1897. The following testimony was admitted, over the objection that it was hearsay, in proof of the fraud alleged:

“J. D. Hunt for plaintiff testified as follows: I know Mr. Peace; he was chief train dispatcher in January and February of last year. I understood he had control of the man to a certain extent.
“Q. Did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co. v. RuleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. FittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Carroll v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. FittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API