Legal Opinion

Hoerr v. Northfield Foundry and MacH. Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1985No. Civ. 10872Published

1Opinion of the Court

376 N.W.2d 323 (1985)

Greg HOERR, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NORTHFIELD FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY and Country Hill Cabinets, Defendants,

G.C. Peterson Company, Inc., Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. No. 10872.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

October 28, 1985.

Gjevre, McLarnan, Hannaher, Vaa, Skatvold McLarnan, Moorhead, Minn., for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Galen Vaa.

Gunhus, Grinnell, Klinger, Swenson & Guy, Moorhead, Minn., for defendant and appellant; argued by Paul E. Grinnell.

GIERKE, Justice.

Defendant G.C. Peterson Company, Inc. [Peterson], appeals from an "amended order"[1] of the District…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API