In Re Tenet Hospitals Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
1Dissent
DON WITTIG,
Senior Justice, dissenting, (Assigned).
Because I would hold that the relator, Tenet Hospitals, has an adequate remedy at law, I respectfully dissent. Mandamus will not issue where there is “a clear and adequate remedy at law, such as a normal appeal.” State v. Walker, 679 S.W.2d 484, 485 (Tex.1984).
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. Republican Party of Texas v. Dietz, 940 S.W.2d 86, 88 (Tex.1997); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex.1992). We do not have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus to supervise or correct incidental rulings of a trial judge where there is an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Holloway v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.