Legal Opinion

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Landeros

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1924No. 8514PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

A correct statement of the nature and result of this cause is comprehended within these quotations from the briefs filed in this court by the parties to it; the first being taken from appellee’s, to which we have added the concluding recitations in full of paragraph V of the trial petition, and the second from appellant’s: ■(1) “The appellee filed this suit against appellant, Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Company, and alleged in his first amended original petition (the pleading upon which he went to trial) that on or about the 9th day of October, 1922, while working as a section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. KowsikowsikiTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HenneganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garza v. San Antonio Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Alley v. Texas Electric Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Emmons v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Beckner v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Johnson v. Wichita Valley Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API