Legal Opinion

Beckner v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1935No. 11584PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

W. F. Barrett sued Al C. and A. S. Beck-ner to recover $2,988.30, the amount alleged to be due for drilling a water well in the city of Sherman, on a lot under lease to A. S. Beckner, and to foreclose an alleged constitutional and statutory lien on the leasehold and the ice plant located thereon.

The nature of plaintiff’s cause of action and defenses urged thereto will appear during the course of the discussion. On answers of the jury to special issues and findings made by the court, judgment was rendered for plaintiff for the sum of $2,131.25, foreclosing the alleged lien on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hewitt v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HenneganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Hart v. BullionTexas Supreme Court · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Swinney v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Werdell v. TurzynskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Parks v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Moore v. NeylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API