Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Alford

Quillian, Judge.

While this court is fully aware of that line of cases exemplified by Fireman’s Fund Indem. Co. v. Peeples, 97 Ga. App. 896 (104 S. E. 2d 664), and Atlanta Transit System v. Harcourt, 94 Ga. App. 503 (95 S. E. 2d 41), to the effect that “a mere narrative of the testimony of the witnesses is not a compliance with the [State Workmen’s Compensation] act because it is the duty of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation to weigh the evidence and decide what are the true facts” (Atlanta Transit System case) and to the effect that “ ‘an award of compensation cannot be lawfully based…