Legal Opinion
Rewardify, Inc. v. Synvest Canco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 10, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00046Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 REWARDIFY, INC., Case No.: 3:21-cv-00046-H-JLB 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 14 v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 15 SYNVEST CANCO, INC.; RED JACKET CAPITAL, INC.; ADAM 16 [Doc. No. 9.] SALAHUDEEN; KEN MCCORD; and 17 DAVE SANDERSON, 18 Defendants. 19 On January 8, 2021, Plaintiff Rewardify, Inc. filed a complaint against Defendants 20 Synvest Canco, Inc., Red Jacket Capital, Inc., Adam Salahudeen, Ken McCord, and Dave 21 Sanderson. (Doc. No. 1, Compl.) On August 9, 2021,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.