Legal Opinion

Loudermilk v. Loudermilk

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint on note. Before Judge Wellborn. Habersham superior court. March term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed.

J. M. Loudermilk sued T. A. Loudermilk as principal, and Jacob Loudermilk as indorser, on a promissory note made by T. A. Loudermilk, dated January 16th, 1888, due January 1st, 1889, payable to Jacob Louder-milk, for $350. The note bore a credit for $150, dated June 11th, 1891, and was indorsed thus: “ I hereby endorse the within note to J. M. Loudermilk,” which endorsement was signed by Jacob Loudermilk. The court on motion struck the pleas other than that of general issue filed by the defendants, and entered up judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants for $259.83…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Nix v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Southern Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Trust Co. v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Wright v. ThreattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API