Ross v. Jones, Blanton & Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, J., York, (1) Actions by J. B. Ross against Jones, Blanton & Co.; (2) G. C. Ormond, as survivor of Ormond & Goforth, against same, and (3) Miller and Dunnovant against same. All plaintiffs appeal.
Read the full summary
Before Klugh, J., York, (1) Actions by J. B. Ross against Jones, Blanton & Co.; (2) G. C. Ormond, as survivor of Ormond & Goforth, against same, and (3) Miller and Dunnovant against same. All plaintiffs appeal. By reason of death of one of parties, defendant, and others being released by Circuit decree, only B. D. Springs and Samuel R. Adams, of the- firm, defendants, are respondents. cites: Under the admissions of the defendants, the plaintiffs were excused from performing the written contract: 52 S. C., 227; 54 S. C., 597; 55 S. C., 6. Plaintiffs could shozv waiver zvithout pleading it: 42…
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion was filed on March 31st, but remittitur was stayed by order on petition for rehearing until.
May 11, 1900. The opinion of the Court was delivered by While these three actions were heard together in the Circuit Court and also in this Court, it was expressly stipulated by the parties litigant that they were not consolidated, but were each entitled to a separate judgment. The first above stated action is one brought by J.B. Ross as plaintiff against Rep Jones, Burwell Blanton, A.R. Eskridge, Samuel R. Adams, Brevard D. Springs and John S. Moore, as partners composing the firm of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. C & L CORP. INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Riley v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Brown v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Williams v. HalfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Williams v. LawrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.