Legal Opinion

Argalas v. the Frank Theiss Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 31, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is filed for the appointment of a receiver and the dissolution of the defendant corporation. It is predicated upon the ground that the defendant company's business has been and is being conducted at a great loss and greatly prejudicial to the interests of its creditors and stockholders, so that its business cannnot be conducted with safety to the public and advantage to the stockholders, and, secondly, upon the general equity jurisdiction of the court to prevent the waste or fraudulent diversion of the corporation's assets, which the stockholders are powerless themselves to prevent.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Bull v. International Power Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  3. Kron v. Trenton Automotive Collateral Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Laredef Corp. v. Fed. Seaboard Terra CottaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API