Whitehead & Matheson Co. v. Jensen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The situation presented by the stipulation of facts in this case is unique. As stipulated the facts disclose that these streets had been platted for more than thirty-five years. How or in what manner the lots in question were assessed for purposes of taxation does not appear, but it does appear that Harding street is an improved street, that Benton avenue is improved to the west line of Piar ding street, and that no part of Benton avenue west of the west line of Harding street has ever been used as a street, and that it has never been opened to public travel during its existence.
We are not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Racine v. CrotsenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Yuba City v. Consolidated Mausoleum SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Le Blond v. Town of PeshtigoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. Paine Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Choals v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Joint School District No. 1 v. BoschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Williams v. CraigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Union Falls Power Co. v. City of Oconto FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936