People v. Tatum
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karnezis
Following a jury trial, defendant Dabney Tatum was found guilty of residential burglary and was sentenced as a Class X offender to a term of 28 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions of error. Defendant contends that: (1) he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) he was denied a fair trial because of the trial court’s actions and comments toward him; (3) he was not mentally competent to represent himself pro se at trial; (4) he was prejudiced by the State’s rebuttal closing argument; (5) the jury instructions were improper; and (6) his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- People v. SimmonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- People v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People v. IngramAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People v. IngramAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.