Legal Opinion

People v. Tatum

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2009No. 1-07-1372PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karnezis

Following a jury trial, defendant Dabney Tatum was found guilty of residential burglary and was sentenced as a Class X offender to a term of 28 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions of error. Defendant contends that: (1) he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) he was denied a fair trial because of the trial court’s actions and comments toward him; (3) he was not mentally competent to represent himself pro se at trial; (4) he was prejudiced by the State’s rebuttal closing argument; (5) the jury instructions were improper; and (6) his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. People v. SimmonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. People v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People v. IngramAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. IngramAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API