People v. Ingram
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lampkin
A jury convicted defendant, Brenetta Ingram, of first degree murder. Defendant contends she is entitled to a new trial because the trial court failed to comply with Illinois Supreme Court Rule 431(b) (eff. May 1, 2007). Defendant also contends the trial court interfered with her right to a fair and impartial jury during jury selection. Defendant finally contends the trial court erred by refusing to issue a jury instruction for second degree murder based on a sudden and intense passion resulting from serious provocation. We affirm.
FACTS
In June 2004, defendant had been staying at the apartment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. ZehrIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. WareAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. IngramAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- People v. JosephAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- People v. IngramIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.