Legal Opinion

People v. Ingram

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 2010No. 1-07-2229PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lampkin

A jury convicted defendant, Brenetta Ingram, of first degree murder. Defendant contends she is entitled to a new trial because the trial court failed to comply with Illinois Supreme Court Rule 431(b) (eff. May 1, 2007). Defendant also contends the trial court interfered with her right to a fair and impartial jury during jury selection. Defendant finally contends the trial court erred by refusing to issue a jury instruction for second degree murder based on a sudden and intense passion resulting from serious provocation. We affirm.

FACTS

In June 2004, defendant had been staying at the apartment…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. ZehrIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WareAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. People v. IngramAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. JosephAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  5. People v. IngramIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API