State v. Huynh
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 The analysis of whether the legislature intended a crime to have alternative means of commission focuses on the act that constitutes the offense. Here, the act that constitutes the offense of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver is possession. The “intent to manufacture or deliver” element deals with the defendant’s subjective mental state and therefore does not constitute alternative means of committing the offense. Further, a defendant is not entitled to unanimity with regard to the statutory factors that make an offense a major violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SonyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State of Washington v. Christopher Lee McCabeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- State Of Washington v. Brandon Lee HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Generous SonyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.