Legal Opinion

Consedine v. Willimansett East SNF

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. 13-30193-MGMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Dkt. No. 42)

MASTROIANNI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

I. Introduction

Glorena B. Consedine (“Plaintiff’) brings this employment discrimination ac*256tion against Willimansett East SNF (“Willimansett East” or “Defendant”), her former employer. Plaintiff asserts claims for disability discrimination (Counts I and VI), failure to accommodate (Counts II and VII), and retaliation (Counts III and VIII) in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, as well as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eichenholz v. Brink's IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  2. Jeniffer Germoso v. Sam’s West, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026
  3. Mckeon v. Robert Reiser & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API