California Ass'n of Rural Health Clinics v. Douglas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on July 5, 2013 is amended as follows:
On page 8 of the slip opinion, the second sentence of the third paragraph, which reads; “We reverse the district court’s holding that the Climes have a private right of action to challenge the Department’s implementation of the SPA prior to obtaining approval,” is stricken.
■ An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With this amendment, the panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Murguia votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Nelson and Tashima so recommend. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- The Arc of California v. Toby DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- B.K. v. Thomas BetlachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- State of Arizona v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Community Health Care Ass'n v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Legacy Community Health Services, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.