Legal Opinion
Escritor v. Maui County Council, Ltd.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1981No. 7948PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
In this case, we sua sponte ordered additional briefing on the question of whether we had jurisdiction of the appeal. The facts involved on that issue are as follows: The complaint herein *201named one corporation, one individual and John and Mary Does 1-10 as defendants. The Does were named pursuant to Rule 17(d), Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP), under a pro forma allegation that their names, identities, capacities, responsibilities or involvement were unknown. No further steps were taken by the plaintiffs-appellants on the record to identify any of the names, identities, capacities,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Merced Hernandez-Rivera and Carlota Garcia-Vasquez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Wolfsohn v. HankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harold Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wong v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Davis v. Wholesale Motors, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
- Myers v. South Seas Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
- Shishido v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Myers v. South Seas Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.