Legal Opinion
Patrick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1935No. 7637PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appellants were indicted for using the mails to defraud, for misapplication of the funds of a national bank, for making false entries in the books of a national bank, and for making false statements and representations and overvaluing securities for the purpose of obtaining a loan from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation in violation of 18 USCA § 338, 12 USCA § 592, and 15 USCA § 616 (a). The indictment contains ten counts. Both appellants were convicted on six counts. The appellant Paul Patrick was sentenced to five years on each of five counts and two years on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Proechel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- E. R. Squibb & Sons v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chevillard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Robertson v. Morganton Full Fashioned Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.