Young Fu Hsu v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Petition unanimously granted in part with costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Substantial evidence supports the determination that respondent discriminated against the three complainants on the basis of their national origin. Complainants, who are Caucasian and worked at respondent’s restaurant as waitresses, established a prima facie case of discrimination by establishing that Asian waitresses were given preference with respect to hours and table assignments (see generally, Ashker v International Bus. Machs. Corp., 168 AD2d 724, 725). Respondent failed to provide a legitimate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. TychanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- New York City Board of Education v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rio Mar Restaurant v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Boodram v. Brooklyn Developmental CenterCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Matter of El Agave Mexican Grill, Inc. v. New York State Div. of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021