Legal Opinion

In Re Frick

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1933No. Docket No. 8718PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Motion to affirm under Rule V, section 3, Rules for Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The appeal is from a judgment confirming an award of arbitrators. The appellant had moved in the superior court to vacate the award on the ground that the arbitrators “were guilty of misconduct and committed gross error and otherwise acted improperly”. He offered in evidence a transcript of the entire evidence taken before the arbitrators for the purpose of showing that the evidence did not support certain findings of facts and conclusions based thereon. The trial court refused to receive the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Carsley v. LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Peachy v. RitchieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. BailesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API