Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Weeks v. Weeks-Rohner

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2018No. S-17-0243Published

1DissentDavis, Chief Justice

[¶ 44] At ¶ 36, the majority holds:

Neither party questioned the inherent authority of the district court to enforce its order. Neither party raised any question in this appeal about the terms of the decree which the district court enforced. Considering the circumstances of this case, the district court had inherent authority to enforce its own decree.

[¶ 45] While I concur in all other aspects of the majority opinion, I do not agree that the district court acted within its enforcement authority when it ordered the Sinclair property to be placed in a trust subject to the Shawn Weeks probate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. PryceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Claman v. PoppWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API