Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Dahl

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1972No. 55927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burman

Plaintiff, Sylvia Roberts, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Arlene Dahl et al., in an action to recover damages for the infringement of a common law copyright in certain unpublished scripts for a television series on beauty hints. In addition to Miss Dahl, defendants are: American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., the broadcaster of the allegedly infringing television show; Clairol, Inc. and Clairol, a division of Bristol-Myers Co., the sponsors of the show; Foote, Cone & fielding, Inc., the advertising agency for Clairol; Ruder & Finn of Chicago, Inc., a public…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fred Fisher, Inc. v. DillinghamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  4. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Golding v. R.K.O. Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Standard Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Vantage Point, Inc. v. Parker Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  3. Welch v. Chicago Tribune Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Herzog v. Castle Rock EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Estate of McKay v. MosesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API