Legal Opinion

Wiederhold v. Prime Builders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1988No. 75519PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant contracted with appellee for the latter to build a shopping center. As part of the process in obtaining permanent financing for the venture, appellant made a partial payment of money owed to appellee and signed a promissory note to the effect that in consideration of the delay in appellant’s payment of the additional funds owed to appellee for services appellee had already provided, and of appellee’s dismissal of its mechanic’s lien action, appellant unconditionally promised to pay appellee $27,229.41 on or before September 30, 1986. Appellant failed to make the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Hyman v. HorwitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Haraka v. DatryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Stembridge v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eakin v. MeighenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API