Legal Opinion
Hyman v. Horwitz
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 9, 1979No. 56942, 56943PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Summary judgment. Appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Horwitz and Mr. and Mrs. Goldstein brought suit against Mr. and Mrs. Hyman based upon two promissory notes made by Ben Hyman & Co. and guraranteed by Mr. and Mrs. Hyman individually. Mrs. Horwitz and Mrs. Goldstein are sisters of Mr. Hyman.
The facts show that the Horwitzes and Goldsteins were associated with Ben Hyman & Co. and were investors and creditors of the company. In 1965 both the Horwitzes and the Goldsteins withdrew from the company. At that time, Ben Hyman & Co. apparently executed notes to the appellees agreeing to pay each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dh Overmyer Company, Inc. v. Joe Summers Roofing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Lee v. GarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Strickland v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Ameagle Contractors, Inc. v. Virginia Supply & Well Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Lake v. Hamilton Bank of DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bradley v. Tattnall BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Swanson v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- A. R. Hudson Realty, Inc. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Berry v. Atlas Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Hodsdon v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.