Legal Opinion
United States v. Hite
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 14, 2013No. Criminal No. 2012-0065PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Defendant Paul David Hite was charged by Superseding Indictment with two counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of both counts. Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s [98] Rule 29 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. The Defendant argues he is entitled to a judgment of acquittal because, as a matter of law, he could not have been charged with attempting to violate the underlying District of Columbia statute identified in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Abbott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Anthony F. MurrellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Mathis, Eddie J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. HillieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. AkinyoyenuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. HarmonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. HillieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- United States v. HiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.