Legal Opinion
Hughes Tool Company v. Varel Manufacturing Company, Inc., Varel Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 21, 1964No. 20661PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
Reacting as do their brother ■attorneys in traditional jury trials, Williams v. National Surety Corp., 5 Cir., 1958, 257 F.2d 771, 773, or proctors in the esoteric admiralty area, Ohio Barge Line, Inc. v. Oil Transp. Co., 5 Cir., 1960, 280 F.2d 448, 449, 1961 AMC 375, these patent-solicitor-advocates are here ostensibly asserting legal errors, but actually .seeking at our hands a new look at the facts. Only in the most superficial way is there even the remotest possible whisper of a suggestion of difference over a single significant legal principle. 1 What has…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- IVES v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cameron Iron Works, Inc. v. Robert O. Stekoll, D/B/A Speed-O-Valve Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.