Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1923No. 14311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKa'Ne, J.

This was an action for recovery of money commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below.

Originally the cause was tried before a justice of the peace and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Thereafter, on trial de novo before the district court on appeal, the same result was reached, and it is to reverse the latter judgment that this proceeding in error was commenced.

The principal ground for reversal relied upon by counsel for plaintiffs in error is stated in their brief as follows: It is the position and contention of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William Cameron Co., Inc. v. YarbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. J. H. Cox & Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collinson v. ThreadgillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Robedeaux v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API