Legal Opinion
Anderjeski v. City Court of City of Mesa
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1983No. 16376-SA, 16403-SAPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We accepted jurisdiction of two petitions for special action pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6 § 5(1) and Arizona Rules for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer two questions on appeal:
1. May a defendant be convicted of both a violation of A.R.S. § 28-692(A) and (B) for conduct arising from a single incident?
2. If so, may defendant be punished separately for the violation of each offense?
In No. 16376-SA, James Anderjeski and 40 others were the defendants. Pursuant to a policy of the City Prosecutor of the City of Mesa, defendants, upon being arrested for driving after the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. TinghitellaArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BlumerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. SeatsArizona Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Jones v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. SheavesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.