Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Company v. United States of America, by and Through Anne M. Burford, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1984No. 82-1811PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In investigating Dow Chemical Company for possible violations of the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency caused aerial photographs of Dow’s 2000-acre Midland, Michigan plant to be made by a private aerial survey company. Upon learning of the EPA flyover, Dow sought declaratory and injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. On cross-motions for. partial summary judgment, the District Court held that EPA’s detailed aerial photography was an unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Ex Rel. AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ohio Civil Service Employees Association v. Richard P. SeiterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Noel C. Jenkins (96-5338) Linda L. Jenkins (96-5346)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Daughenbaugh v. City of TiffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API