Legal Opinion
Winingham v. Sig Sauer Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 7, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01037Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Harvey Winingham, No. CV-22-01037-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Sig Sauer Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 At issue is Defendant Sig Sauer, Incorporated’s Motion for Summary Judgment 16 (Doc. 71-1, MSJ) accompanied by a Statement of Facts (Doc. 71-2, DSOF), to which 17 Plaintiff Harvey Winingham filed a Response (Doc. 78, Resp.) accompanied by a 18 Statement of Facts (Doc. 77, PSOF), and Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. 81, Reply). The 19 Court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and finds this matter…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.