Legal Opinion

City of Norman v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 2875

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 2006No. 102,887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JANE P. WISEMAN, Presiding Judge.

T1 This appeal arises out of the trial court's determination that American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local No. 2875 (Defendant) was entitled to postjudgment attorney fees and costs pursuant to City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Owens, 1977 OK 86, 565 P.2d 4, and subsequent cases, as a result of oppressive litigation conduct by City of Norman (Plaintiff).

2 Although the trial court's order states that Defendant is entitled to attorney fees as an exception to the "American Rule" and grants Defendant's application for attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Axtell v. Park School District R-3Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Kattoura v. PatelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. M Life Insurance Co. v. Sapers & Wallack Insurance Agency, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Green v. CallahanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. Beavers v. ByersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Beavers v. ByersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Weissenberger v. Coppermark BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API