Legal Opinion
Weissenberger v. Coppermark Bank
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 22, 2013No. 108,717Published
1Opinion of the Court
WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Presiding Judge.
1 1 This is the second appeal in Appellants' breach of contract case. In the first, another panel of the same division of the Court of Civil Appeals, Case No. 106,711, affirmed the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Coppermark Bank (Bank) and its order granting Bank's motion for attorney fees and costs. The Supreme *436Court, by order filed February 22, 2010, denied Appellants' petition for certiorari and granted Bank's motion for attorneys fees with the following instruction, "after mandate issues, trial judge is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Handy v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.