Legal Opinion
Hazelwood v. Bruck Law Offices SC
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 25, 2007No. 06-C-0662PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Chanda Hazelwood, Kim Jackson and Ethel Wise bring this putative class ac*524tion alleging that defendant Bruck Law Offices S.C. violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq, by sending them a collection letter on behalf of Northstar Loans, Inc, misrepresenting that they, as payday loan borrowers, were liable for treble damages. Plaintiffs also bring a supplemental state law claim alleging that defendant violated the Wisconsin Consumer Act (‘WCA”), Wis. Stat. § 427. Before me now is plaintiffs’ motion for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Herrera v. LCS Financial Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Baxter v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009