Legal Opinion
Baxter v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 1, 2009No. 07 C 6745PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
Named plaintiff Keith Baxter alleges that he purchased a new 2006 Kawasaki Vulcan Nomad 1600 motorcycle that has an odometer which overstates the mileage actually ridden on the motorcycle. Named as defendants are Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A. (“KMC”) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. (“KHI”), which allegedly designed, manufactured, marketed, and/or distributed the motorcycle. Presently pending is plaintiffs motion for class certification.
Also pending is defendants’ motion to strike or, alternatively, to file a surreply. Defendants contend that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Carol B. Oshana v. Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Baxter v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012