Legal Opinion

Houser v. Olmstead

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930No. File No. 6985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

It being deemed necessary that land belonging to appellant should be acquired for highway purposes, the amount of damages accruing to appellant, by reason of such talcing, was estimated by appraisal pursuant to the provisions of chapter 139, Raws 1927, and appellant was notified that the county was prepared to pay the amount fixed by the appraisers. A petition signed by more than seven taxpayers of the county was presented to the state’s attorney of the county demanding that an appeal be taken from the action of the board deciding to pay the amount of the appraisal, and in response to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arnett v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Barnum v. EwingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. County of Rock Island v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Muskogee County, Oklahoma v. Lanning McRobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Board of Com'rs v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Camp Crook Independent School District No. 1 v. ShevlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Weger v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. South Dakota Department of Transportation v. FreemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API