Wilbur v. Buckingham
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Union District Gourt. — Hon. H. K. Evans, Judge. Action for damages to an automobile resulted in a judgment against defendant, from which he appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1. Appeal: conciusiyeness of verdict. On April 28, 1909, plaintiff left his automobile in defendant’s barn, and went to Missouri. He returned about July 1, and upon examining the machine discovered, as he testified, that it had been _ _ __ damaged. He demanded ox defendant that ^ lie put it in as good condition as when delivered in his barn. The defendant declined to have it repaired, and insisted that the machine was in substantially the same condition as when left with him, and that, if used, this was with the plaintiff’s consent. Plaintiff denied having authorized use, save by one Shatto,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nash v. ClassenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. PearceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Mount Vernon Brewing Co. v. TeschnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- State Ex Rel. Moseley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Nelson Morris & Co. v. Columbian Iron Works & Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McHenry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- U. S. Homes, Inc. v. YatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Hunt v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- United States v. Leo JacobsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- In Re Estate of ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932