United States v. Leo Jacobs
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of robbery 1 and assault with a dangerous weapon. 2 We affirm notwithstanding an instruction with which we are not in agreement. We affirm because no objection was made to the instruction, and in the context of the case as a whole the error, though we deem it plain, did not affect a substantial right of the appellant. Thus we are not called upon to reverse under the discretion residing in the court under Rule 52(b), Fed.R.Crim.P.
The instruction advised the jury to, Consider all of the evidence that you have heard in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Eagle Lake Improvement Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Mack Daniel and Ab Daniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Loney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Larsen v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Robert L. PinkneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Clarke v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- McCowan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. Willard F. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Robert L. PinkneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976