Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
The action is one against a surety on a surety bond. The complaint alleges that a contract was made between the city of New York and Carrizzo & Izzo, contractors, dated May 19, 1927, whereby the contractors, who are defendant’s principals, were granted the privilege of sorting and reclaiming waste materials at certain of the city’s land dumps for a period of three years, commencing May 24, 1927. It states further that the contractors agreed to pay $536.99 each week during the term of the agreement; that defendant executed its bond in the sum of $15,000 for the performance by the contractors…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gillespie v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Ettlinger v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Datz v. Economy Cotton Goods Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Coleman Capital Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Security National Bank of Long Island v. EstatioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Taylor-Fichter Steel Construction Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Master Contracting Corp. v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.