Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon v. Oregon State Lottery Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief, in which plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of statutes that circumscribe video lottery games and the allocation of lottery proceeds. In their first claim, they allege that the Lottery Commission will violate Article XV, section 4(7) of the Oregon Constitution,1 by implementing ORS 461.215 and ORS 461.217,2 because “video poker will have the effect of creating casino gambling.” In their second claim, they allege that ORS 461.5463 is unconstitutional, because it *739allocates lottery revenues for purposes other than creating jobs and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Hawkins v. ConklinOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Dry Canyon Farms, Inc. v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994